Just want to spread this info as much as possible, since the designer in question generated so much buzz in his defense (somehow).
i’m still not sure who’s the liar in this case, but i’m thinking jon might be at this point. i, too, thought about the libel and slander and the fact that the attorneys would be in big fat trouble if they had, indeed, contacted his clients. then again, corporate boneheadedness surprises me not. if this post is the truth, and stockart’s licensing doesn’t work the way jon claims it does, then i owe stockart an apology. someone stole from someone, that’s perfectly obvious.